JurisAtlas

HomeBar Review2009Criminal LawQuestion IV

Question IV

2009 Bar · Criminal Law · 2 sub-questions

Charlie hated his classmate, Brad, because the latter was assiduously courting Lily, Charlie's girlfriend. Charlie went to a veterinarian and asked for some poison on the pretext that it would be used to kill a very sick, old dog. Actually, Charlie intended to use the poison on Brad.
(a)(a) The veterinarian mistakenly gave Charlie a non-toxic powder which, when mixed with Brad's food, did not kill Brad. Did Charlie commit any crime? If so, what and why? If not, why not? (3%)
(b)(b) Would your answer be the same if Brad proved to be allergic to the powder, and after ingesting it with his food, fell ill and was hospitalized for ten (10) days? Explain. (3%)

Model answer · ALAC

Answer — Legal basis — Application — Conclusion.

AI-drafted in ALAC form and AI-verified against landmark authorities — refined with every round of verification.

Sign in free to read Question I of every Criminal Law year — subscribe to unlock all model answers & authorities.

Sign in or register — it's freeHave an access code? Redeem it →