JurisAtlas

HomeBar Review2018Criminal LawQuestion IV

Question IV

2018 Bar · Criminal Law · 2 sub-questions

IV. On the way home from work, Rica lost her necklace to a snatcher. A week later, she saw what looked like her necklace on display in a jewelry store in Raon. Believing that the necklace on display was the same necklace snatched from her the week before, she surreptitiously took the necklace without the knowledge and consent of the store owner. Later, the loss of the necklace was discovered, and Rica was shown on the CCTV camera of the store as the culprit. Accordingly, Rica was charged with theft of the necklace. Rica raised the defense that she could not be guilty as charged because she was the owner of the necklace and that the element of intent to gain was lacking. What should be the verdict if:
(a)(a) The necklace is proven to be owned by Rica? (2.5%)
(b)(b) It is proven that the store acquired the necklace from another person who was the real owner of the necklace? (2.5%)

Model answer · ALAC

Answer — Legal basis — Application — Conclusion.

AI-drafted in ALAC form and AI-verified against landmark authorities — refined with every round of verification.

Sign in free to read Question I of every Criminal Law year — subscribe to unlock all model answers & authorities.

Sign in or register — it's freeHave an access code? Redeem it →