1. Juan, acting as president of Maharlika Car Dealers Incorporated (MCDI), entered into a contract of long-term lease with Antonino over a large commercial property along Pasong Tamo Avenue owned by the latter. When Antonino received a better offer for the commercial property, and having learned that MCDI was not formally incorporated with the Securities and Exchange Commission, he sought to have the contract of lease nullified on the ground that it was void for lack of the essential element of consent, since the lessee was not a juridical person with capacity to contract. May Juan, acting on behalf of MCDI, which is in the process of incorporation, legally insist on the enforceability and binding effect of the contract of lease as against Antonino? Explain your answer.