Home›Bar Review›2023›Political Law›Question 16
Question 16
16. Bea filed a civil case for collection of a sum of money for non-payment by the
province of Cagayan of various hospital supplies it purchased from her, as
evidenced by invoices duly received and signed by its authorized representatives.
After Bea completed the presentation of her evidence, the province moved to
dismiss the case on the ground that the primary jurisdiction over her money claim
belongs to the Commission on Audit (COA), as it arose from a series of
procurement transactions with the province. The trial court dismissed the case on
the ground that jurisdiction over the case lies with the COA. Bea argued that the
trial court erred since a collection suit is within the jurisdiction of the courts and
the province belatedly invoked the doctrine. Is Bea correct? Explain.
Model answer · ALAC
Answer — Legal basis — Application — Conclusion.
AI-drafted in ALAC form and AI-verified against landmark authorities — refined with every round of verification.