8. Amor filed against Yoda and the Register of Deeds an action for reconveyance, nullity of sale, and cancellation of certificate of title before the Regional Trial Court (RTC). Amor alleged that Yoda unlawfully obtained a certificate of title when he registered the disputed land in his name based on a falsified deed of sale. In due course, the RTC found Amor as the lawful owner of the realty and declared the sale void. However, the RTC failed to expressly include in the dispositive portion the cancellation of the certificate of title. The decision became final and executory. Amor moved for clarificatory inquiry about the omission in the dispositive portion. The RTC clarified its final judgment and required the Register of Deeds to cancel the certificate of title. Aggrieved, Yoda questioned the RTC’s course of action and argued that it cannot modify a final judgment to correct perceived errors of law and fact. Did the RTC violate the doctrine of immutability of final judgment when it required the Register of Deeds to cancel the certificate of title? Explain.