Home›Library
876 Supreme Court decisions, resolutions, and opinions from 1901 to today. Filter and sort to narrow down.
This administrative case stemmed from a letter-report 1 dated 24 September 2015, submitted by Executive Judge Juanita T. Guerrero of the Regional Trial Court of Muntinlupa City before the Office of the Bar Confidant (OBC). The Executive Judge endorsed to the OBC, for appropriate
This Petition for Review on Certiorari 1 assails the April 27, 2012 Decision 2 and June 27, 2012 Resolution 3 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CAG.R. S.P. No. 114001. The CA reversed and set aside the December 16, 2009 4 and February 26, 2010 5 Resolutions of the National Labor R
Employment is not only a source of income, but for others, a means of survival. As such, saving a business from financial woes should not be achieved at the expense of the employees' livelihood Reducing the workforce through retrenchment should be availed of only in cases of a cl
This administrative matter stemmed from a financial audit report 1 of the Financial Audit Team, Fiscal Monitoring Division, Court Management Office, Office of the Court Administrator (OCA), on the books of accounts of Aninding M. Alauya (respondent), Clerk of Court II, Shari'a Ci
Before the Court is a Petition for Review on Certiorari 1 (Petition) assailing the Decision 2 dated November 6, 2015 and Resolution 3 dated February 15, 2016 of the Court of Appeals, Sixth Division (CA), in CA-G.R. SP No. 140220. The CA affirmed the Decision dated April 26, 2013
This ordinary appeal challenges the Decision 1 dated April 26, 2018 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CR-HC No. 08616, which affirmed the Judgment 2 dated July 15, 2016 of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Manila, Branch 9 in Crim. Case Nos. 11-288374-78, finding accusedap
This Petition for Review on Certiorari 1 under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court assails the Resolution 2 dated December 13, 2018 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 12099 which dismissed the Petition for Annulment of Judgment 3 filed by petitioner Eleonor Sarol (Sarol) ag
Before this Court are two consolidated petitions for review on certiorari 1 under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court seeking to annul and set aside the Consolidated Decision 2 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP Nos. 146550 and 146740 dated November 9, 2017, and its and Resolut
Attempts to circumvent a law that requires certain conditions to be met before granting benefits demonstrates malice and gross negligence amounting to bad faith on the part of the government corporation's officers, who are well-aware of such law. In this petition for certiorari u
This is a petition for mandamus to compel the Commission on Elections (COMELEC) to review the voter verifiable paper audit trail, to employ another method of digitally signing the election results, and to remove the supposed prohibition on capturing devices while inside the polli
Before the Court is a petition for certiorari 1 under Rule 64 in relation to Rule 65 of the Rules of Court, which seeks to set aside Decision No. 2018-126 2 dated January 26,2018 of the Commission on Audit (COA). The assailed Decision affirmed Regional Office No. VIII Decision No
Subject to review under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court at the instance of Jimmy Paez (petitioner) is the February 25, 2013 Decision 1 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 112151, affirming with modification the May 29, 2009 Decision 2 of the National Labor Relations Comm
This Petition for Certiorari 1 under Rule 64, in relation to Rule 65 of the Rules of Court seeks to annul and set aside the Decision 2 dated November 23, 2017 and the Resolution dated August 16, 2018 of the Commission on Audit (COA), which affirmed the 32 Notice of Disallowances
This is an appeal filed by Roger Padin y Tilar (accused-appellant) from the Decision 1 dated February 21, 2019 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CR HC No. 10101 denying the appeal from the Decision 2 dated October 27, 2017 of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of xxxxxxxxxxx Br
A judge is not above the law. 1 When a magistrate refuses to submit to judicial processes by becoming a fugitive from justice, he disrespects the law he is sworn to uphold and protect. By turning into a transgressor of the law, he brings disrepute to his office and impairs public
Before the Court is a Petition for Review on Certiorari 1 under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court filed by petitioner Commissioner of Internal Revenue (CIR), assailing the Decision 2 dated May 17, 2016 and Resolution 3 dated September 9, 2016 of the Court of Tax Appeals en banc (CTA
On appeal is the August 25, 2015 Decision 1 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CR.-H.C. No. 01193-MIN affirming in toto the June 13, 2013 Judgment 2 of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Manolo Fortich, Bukidnon, Branch 11, in Criminal Case No. 07-02-3234, which found accused
Before the Court is a Petition for Review on Certiorari 1 (Petition) under Rule 45 assailing the Decision 2 dated March 20, 2018 and Resolution 3 dated June 27, 2018, both of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. No. 150904. The CA affirmed the Decision 4 dated December 8, 2016 of
Before Us is a Petition for Review on Certiorari 1 assailing the Decision 2 dated June 19, 2018 and the Resolution 3 dated January 21, 2019 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CEB CV No. 05971, which reversed the Decision 4 dated March 27, 2015 of the Regional Trial Court (RT
Adelita S. Villamor (Villamor) charges Atty. Ely Galland A. Jumao-as (Atty. Jumao-as) with violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility (CPR) for representing conflicting interests. Villamor alleged that Felipe Retubado (Retubado) and Atty. Jumao-as coaxed her into organi
