Home›Library
1,036 Supreme Court decisions, resolutions, and opinions from 1901 to today. Filter and sort to narrow down.
918-A Phil. 1 The present case involved two administrative complaints, namely: (1) complaint 1 filed by former Presiding Judge, Regional Trial Court (RTC), Tagaytay City, Branch 18, and presently Assisting Judge of RTC, Malabon City, Branch 74, Edwin G. Larida, Jr. (Judge Larida)
918-A Phil. 592 Before the Court is a Petition for Review on Certiorari 1 (Petition) under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court (Rules) assailing the Decision 2 dated July 1, 2014 (Decision) and Resolution 3 dated February 23, 2015 (Resolution) of the Court of Appeals 4 (CA) in CA-G.R.
918-A Phil. 661 Antecedents Petitioners ANGKLA: Ang Partido Ng Mga Pilipinong Marino, Inc., (ANGKLA) and Serbisyo sa Bayan Party (SBP) move for reconsideration of the Court's Decision dated September 15, 2020 upholding the constitutionality of the proviso in Section 11(b) of Repu
918-A Phil. 842 This Petition for Certiorari 1 filed under Rule 65 of the Revised Rules of Court assails the Commission on Audit's (COA) Resolution 2 dated August 15, 2019, which denied Zaldy Uy Ampatuan's (petitioner) "Omnibus Motion for Reconsideration of Decision No. 2016-171
918-A Phil. 746; 120 OG No. 46, 13219 (November 11, 2024) This petition for review on certiorari 1 assails the following dispositions of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. CV No. 109851 entitled Janice Maristela-Cuan, Petitioner-Appellee v. Marcelino A. Cuan, Jr., Respondent, and Re
918-A Phil. 806 This petition for review on certiorari assails the following dispositions of the Court of Appeals in CA GR SP No. 159899 entitled Spouses Marcelo G. Flores and Medelyn Flores v. Spouses Leopoldo A. Estrellado and Enriqueta Estrellado, Bede Tabalingcos, Atty. Cres
918-B Phil. 1110 These are consolidated petitions for certiorari and prohibition with urgent prayer for the issuance of a temporary restraining order (TRO) and/or preliminary injunction ( Consolidated Petitions ), 1 seeking to annul and set aside: (1) Section 11(f) and (g) of Rep
918-A Phil. 770 The Case This is a Petition for Review on Certiorari 1 (Petition) filed under Rule 45 of the 1997 Rules of Court (1997 Rules) against the December 17, 2018 Decision 2 (assailed Decision) and July 4, 2019 Resolution 3 (assailed Resolution) rendered by the Court of
918-A Phil. 371 A child whose parents did not marry each other can inherit from their grandparent by their right of representation, regardless of the grandparent's marital status at the birth of the child's parent. For this Court's resolution are two consolidated Petitions for Re
918-A Phil. 224 A person cannot serve two masters without detriment to one of them. 1 It is from this basic human frailty that the " doctrine of corporate opportunity " was recognized and laws were put in place to deter corporate officers from using their position of trust and co
918-A Phil. 144 These consolidated petitions for review on certiorari 2 assail the September 22, 2010 Decision 3 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CV No. 80775 and its March 16, 2011 Resolution, 4 that affirmed with modification the April 30, 2003 Decision 5 of the Regional
918-A Phil. 639 Before this Court is a Petition for Review on Certiorari 1 under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court assailing the Decision 2 dated September 14, 2018 rendered by the Court of Appeals ( CA ) in CA-GR CV No. 109378, which affirmed the Decision 3 dated May 4, 2017 of the
918-A Phil. 726 This is an appeal 1 from the Decision 2 dated January 21, 2019 of the Court of Appeals (CA), Second Division in CA-G.R. CR-HC No. 10066, which affirmed with modification the Decision 3 dated May 5, 2017 of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Antipolo City, Branch 72
918-A Phil. 613 Before the Court are two (2) petitions for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court, filed separately by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue ( CIR ) and Taganito Mining Corporation ( TMC ), seeking the reversal of the Decision 1 dated December 16,
This resolves the Petition for Certiorari 1 under Rule 45 filed by petitioner Khoo Boo Boon assailing the Decision 2 dated November 29, 2011 and the Resolution 3 dated December 11, 2012 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 121334, which set aside the Resolutions dated May 12
Challenged in this petition 1 are the July 23, 2009 Decision 2 and March 10, 2010 Resolution 3 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CV No. 00272-MIN, which dismissed the (a) complaint 4 for quieting of Original Certificate of Title (OCT) No. P-46114 and recovery of possession
This Petition for Review on Certiorari 1 assails the July 31, 2013 Decision 2 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 125286 which dismissed petitioner's Petition for Annulment of Judgment 3 and the June 6, 2014 Resolution 4 denying petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration
Before the Court is a Petition for Review 1 seeking the reversal of the Decision 2 dated October 7, 2015 and the Resolution 3 dated March 10, 2016 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 06239-MIN which affirmed the Decision 4 dated April 16, 2014 rendered by the Branch 10
This Court resolves an appeal from the Decision 1 dated June 25, 2019 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CR-HC No. 10147. The Decision affirmed with modification the Decision 2 dated November 27, 2017 of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Pasig City, Branch 158, which found P
