JurisAtlas

HomeBar Review2008Labor Law

2008 Bar Examination · Labor Law

Labor Law2008

Every Labor Law question from the 2008 Bar, traced to the statutes, cases and Supreme Court doctrines it tests. Open any question for the facts, the mapped authorities, and the ALAC model answer.

14questions
14sub-questions
70mapped authorities
ALACmodel answers

The 2008 Labor Law questions

Questions are public-domain (Supreme Court Bar examinations). Each ALAC model answer is AI-drafted from landmark authorities and refined with every round of verification.

Q Isingle question

I. Explain the automatic renewal clause of collective bargaining agreements. (3%) Explain the extent of the workers right to participate in policy and decision-making process as provided under Article

3 statutes1 doctrineView answer →
Q IIsingle question

II. What issues or disputes may be the subject of voluntary arbiration under the Labor Code? (4%) Can a dispute falling within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Labor Arbiter be submitted to voluntary

3 statutes3 cases1 doctrineView answer →
Q IIIsingle question

III. Savoy Department Store (SDS) adopted a policy of hiring salesladies on five-month cycles. At the end of a saleslady's five-month term, another person is hired as replacement. Salesladies attend t

3 statutes1 case1 doctrineView answer →
Q IVsingle question

IV. Super Comfort Hotel employed a regular pool of "extra waiters" who are called or asked to report for duty when the Hotel's volume of business is beyond the capacity of the regularly employed waite

3 statutes3 cases1 doctrineView answer →
Q Vsingle question

V. The Pizza Corporation (PizCorp) and Ready Supply Cooperative (RSC) entered into a "service agreement" where RSC in consideration of service fees to be paid by PizCorp's will exclusively supply PizC

3 statutes3 cases1 doctrineView answer →
Q VIsingle question

VI. On the day that the Union could validly declare a strike, the Secretary of Labor issued an order assuming jurisdiction over the dispute and enjoining the strike, or if one has commenced, ordering

3 statutes3 cases1 doctrineView answer →
Q VIIsingle question

VII. Tito Paciencioso is an employee of a foundry shop in Malabon, Metro Manila. He is barely able to make ends meet with his salary of P4,000.00 a month. One day, he asked his employer to stop deduct

1 statute1 doctrineView answer →
Q VIIIsingle question

VIII. Carol de la Cruz is the secretary of the proprietor of an auto dealership in quezon City. She resides in Caloocan City. Her office hours start at 8 a.m. and end at 5 p.m. On July 30, 2008, at 7

3 statutes1 doctrineView answer →
Q IXsingle question

IX. Assume that in Problem 5, Mario, an RSC member disgusted with the non-payment of his night shift differential and overtime pay, filed a complaint with the DOLE Regional Office against RSC and PizC

1 statute1 case1 doctrineView answer →
Q Xsingle question

X. Pepe Santos was an international flight steward of Flysafe Airlines. Under FSA's Cabin Crew Administration Manual, Santos must maintain, given his height and body frame, a weight of 150 to 170 poun

3 statutes1 doctrineView answer →
Q XIsingle question

XI. Complaints had worked five (5) years as waitresses in a cocktail lounge owned by the respondent. They did not receive any salary directly from the respondent but shared in all service charges coll

3 statutes1 doctrineView answer →
Q XIIsingle question

XII. Arnaldo, President of "Bisig" Union in Femwear Company, readied himself to leave exactly at 5:00 p.m. which was the end of his normal shift to be able to sed off his wife who was scheduled to lea

3 statutes2 cases1 doctrineView answer →
Q XIIIsingle question

XIII. The rank-and-file union staged a strike in the company premises which caused the disruption of business operations. The supervisors union of the same company filed a money claim for unpaid salar

3 statutes1 case1 doctrineView answer →
Q XIVsingle question

XIV. "Puwersa", a labor federation, after having won in a certification election held in the company premises, sent a letter to respondent company reminding it of its obligation to recognize the local

3 statutes1 case1 doctrineView answer →