JurisAtlas

HomeBar Review2009Remedial Law

2009 Bar Examination · Remedial Law

Remedial Law2009

Every Remedial Law question from the 2009 Bar, traced to the statutes, cases and Supreme Court doctrines it tests. Open any question for the facts, the mapped authorities, and the ALAC model answer.

19questions
19sub-questions
75mapped authorities
ALACmodel answers

The 2009 Remedial Law questions

Questions are public-domain (Supreme Court Bar examinations). Each ALAC model answer is AI-drafted from landmark authorities and refined with every round of verification.

Q Isingle question

I. TRUE or FALSE. Answer TRUE if the statement is true, or FALSE if the statement is false. Explain your answer in not more than two (2) sentences. (5%) The Vallejo standard refers to jurisprudential

1 statute2 cases1 doctrineView answer →
Q IIsingle question

II. Angelina sued Armando before the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Manila to recover the ownership and possession of two parcels of land; one situated in Pampanga, and the other in Bulacan. May the ac

2 statutes1 doctrineView answer →
Q IIIsingle question

III. Amorsolo, a Filipino citizen permanently residing in New York City, filed with the RTC of Lipa City a Complaint for Rescission of Contract of Sale of Land against Brigido, a resident of Barangay

1 doctrineView answer →
Q IVsingle question

IV. Pedrito and Tomas, Mayor and Treasurer, respectively, of the Municipality of San Miguel, Leyte, are charged before the Sandiganbayan for violation of Section 3 (e), Republic Act No. 3019 (Anti-Gra

2 statutes1 doctrineView answer →
Q Vsingle question

V. Frank and Gina were married on June 12, 1987 in Manila. Barely a year after the wedding, Frank exhibited a violent temperament, forcing Gina, for reasons of personal safety, to live with her parent

3 statutes1 doctrineView answer →
Q VIsingle question

VI. Arrested in a buy-bust operation, Edmond was brought to the police station where he was informed of his constitutional rights. During the investigation, Edmond refused to give any statement. Howev

2 statutes2 cases1 doctrineView answer →
Q VIIsingle question

VII. Cresencio sued Dioscoro for collection of a sum of money. During the trial, but after the presentation of plaintiff's evidence, Dioscoro died. Atty. Cruz, Dioscoro's counsel, then filed a motion

3 statutes1 case1 doctrineView answer →
Q VIIIsingle question

VIII. On July 15, 2009, Atty. Manananggol was served copies of numerous unfavorable judgments and orders. On July 29, 2009, he filed motions for reconsideration which were denied. He received the noti

3 statutes1 doctrineView answer →
Q IXsingle question

IX. Modesto sued Ernesto for a sum of money, claiming that the latter owed him P1-million, evidenced by a promissory note, quoted and attached to the complaint. In his answer with counterclaim, Ernest

3 statutes2 cases1 doctrineView answer →
Q Xsingle question

X. Upon termination of the pre-trial, the judge dictated the pre-trial order in the presence of the parties and their counsel, reciting what had transpired and defining three (3) issues to be tried. I

3 statutes1 doctrineView answer →
Q XIsingle question

XI. TRUE or FALSE The accused in a criminal case has the right to avail of the various modes of discovery. The viatory right of a witness served with a subpoena ad testificandum refers to his right no

3 statutes1 case1 doctrineView answer →
Q XIIsingle question

XII. Mike was renting an apartment unit in the building owned by Jonathan. When Mike failed to pay six months' rent, Jonathan filed an ejectment suit. The Municipal Trial Court (MTC) rendered judgment

3 statutes1 case1 doctrineView answer →
Q XIIIsingle question

XIII. Continental Chemical Corporation (CCC) filed a complaint for a sum of money against Barstow Trading Corporation (BTC) for the latter's failure to pay for its purchases of industrial chemicals. I

3 statutes1 doctrineView answer →
Q XIVsingle question

XIV. The Republic of the Philippines, through the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) filed with the RTC a complaint for the expropriation of the parcel of land owned by Jovito. The land is

1 statute1 doctrineView answer →
Q XVsingle question

XV. Florencio sued Guillermo for partition of a property they owned in common. Guillermo filed a motion to dismiss the complaint because Florencio failed to implead Hernando and Inocencio, the other c

2 statutes1 doctrineView answer →
Q XVIsingle question

XVI. After the prosecution had rested and made its formal offer of evidence, with the court admitting all of the prosecution evidence, the accused filed a demurrer to evidence with leave of court. The

3 statutes1 case1 doctrineView answer →
Q XVIIsingle question

XVII. Having obtained favorable judgment in his suit for a sum of money against Patricio, Orencio sought the issuance of a writ of execution. When the writ was issued, the sheriff levied upon a parcel

2 statutes1 doctrineView answer →
Q XVIIIsingle question

XVIII. Pinoy died without a will. His wife, Rosie, and three children executed a deed of extrajudicial settlement of his estate. The deed was properly published and registered with the Office of the R

3 statutes2 cases1 doctrineView answer →
Q XIXsingle question

XIX. Distinguish the two (2) modes of appeal from the judgment of the Regional Trial Court to the Court of Appeals. (3%) What is the writ of amparo? How is it distinguished from the writ of habeas cor

2 statutes1 doctrineView answer →