JurisAtlas

HomeBar Review2017Remedial Law

2017 Bar Examination · Remedial Law

Remedial Law2017

Every Remedial Law question from the 2017 Bar, traced to the statutes, cases and Supreme Court doctrines it tests. Open any question for the facts, the mapped authorities, and the ALAC model answer.

19questions
26sub-questions
68mapped authorities
ALACmodel answers

The 2017 Remedial Law questions

Questions are public-domain (Supreme Court Bar examinations). Each ALAC model answer is AI-drafted from landmark authorities and refined with every round of verification.

Q I2 sub-questions

I. What trial court outside Metro Manila has exclusive original jurisdiction over the following cases? Explain briefly your answers.

1 statute1 case1 doctrineView answer →
Q IIsingle question

II. Santa filed against Era in the RTC of Quezon City an action for specific performance praying for the delivery of a parcel of land subject of their contract of sale. Unknown to the parties, the cas

2 statutes1 case1 doctrineView answer →
Q III4 sub-questions

III. Answer the following briefly:

3 statutes1 case1 doctrineView answer →
Q IV3 sub-questions

IV. Give brief answers to the following:

3 statutes1 case1 doctrineView answer →
Q Vsingle question

V. After working for 25 years in the Middle East, Evan returned to the Philippines to retire in Manila, the place of his birth and childhood. Ten years before his retirement, he bought for cash in his

3 statutes1 doctrineView answer →
Q VIsingle question

VI. Hanna, a resident of Manila, filed a complaint for the partition of a large tract of land located in Oriental Mindoro. She impleaded her two brothers John and Adrian as defendants but did not impl

3 statutes1 doctrineView answer →
Q VIIsingle question

VII. Elise obtained a loan of ₱3 Million from Merchant Bank. Aside from executing a promissory note in favor of Merchant Bank, she executed a deed of real estate mortgage over her house and lot as sec

3 statutes1 case1 doctrineView answer →
Q VIIIsingle question

VIII. A. Laura was the lessee of an apartment unit owned by Louie. When the lease expired, Laura refused to vacate the property. Her refusal prompted Louie to file an action for unlawful detainer agai

2 statutes1 doctrineView answer →
Q IXsingle question

IX. Abraham filed a complaint for damages in the amount of ₱750,000.00 against Salvador in the RTC in Quezon City for the latter's alleged breach of their contract of services. Salvador promptly filed

2 statutes1 doctrineView answer →
Q Xsingle question

X. On the basis of an alleged promissory note executed by Harold in favor of Ramon, the latter filed a complaint for ₱950,000.00 against the former in the RTC of Davao City. In an unverified answer, H

2 statutes1 doctrineView answer →
Q XI2 sub-questions

XI. A. Teddy filed against Buboy an action for rescission of a contract for the sale of a commercial lot. After having been told by the wife of Buboy that her husband was out of town and would not be

3 statutes1 case1 doctrineView answer →
Q XIIsingle question

XII. A. Judgment was rendered against defendant Jaypee in an action for unlawful detainer. The judgment ordered Jaypee to vacate and to pay attorney's fees in favor of Bart, the plaintiff. To prevent

1 case1 doctrineView answer →
Q XIIIsingle question

XIII. Police officers arrested Mr. Druggie in a buy-bust operation and confiscated from him 10 sachets of shabu and several marked genuine peso bills worth ₱5,000.00 used as the buy-bust money during

1 statute1 doctrineView answer →
Q XIVsingle question

XIV. Immediately before he died of gunshot wounds to his chest, Venancio told the attending physician, In a very feeble voice, that it was Arnulfo, his co-worker, who had shot him. Venancio added that

1 statute2 cases1 doctrineView answer →
Q XVsingle question

XV. In an attempt to discredit and impeach a Prosecution witness in a homicide case, the defense counsel called to the stand a person who had been the boyhood friend and next-door neighbor of the Pros

2 statutes1 doctrineView answer →
Q XVIsingle question

XVI. Engr. Magna Nakaw, the District Engineer of the DPWH in the Province of Walang Progreso, and Mr. Pork Chop, a private contractor, were both charged in the Office of the Ombudsman for violation of

1 statute1 doctrineView answer →
Q XVIIsingle question

XVII. Juancho entered a plea of guilty when he was arraigned under an information for homicide. To determine the penalty to be imposed, the trial court allowed Juancho to present evidence proving any

1 statute1 doctrineView answer →
Q XVIIIsingle question

XVIII. Tomas was criminally charged with serious physical injuries allegedly committed against Darvin. During the pendency of the criminal case, Darvin filed a separate civil action for damages based

3 statutes1 case1 doctrineView answer →
Q XIXsingle question

XIX. Boy Maton, a neighborhood tough guy, was arrested by a police officer on suspicion that he was keeping prohibited drugs in his clutch bag. When Boy Maton was searched immediately after the arrest

3 statutes1 doctrineView answer →